Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jerome Kym vs Matic Kriznik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kym vs Kriznik analysis and find out who is favored!
Jerome Kym vs Matic Kriznik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kym 0 - 0 Kriznik
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kym has won 54.6% of points on his second serve, while Kriznik has won 46.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kym, in recent form, has won 51.8% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kriznik has won 51.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.57% and 28.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kym has saved 56.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kriznik has saved 52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kym has won 73.47% of matches played (W/L 36/ 13), with Kriznik winning 36.67% (W/L 11/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kym has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 79% (W/L 23/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 12/ 10). Kriznik has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Kym has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.42% of matches (W/L 24/ 7), where as Kriznik has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 36.67% of matches (W/L 11/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kym has played against opponents with an average rank of 162.33 while Kriznik has played against players with an average rank of 193.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kym has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kriznik has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kym has converted 38.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kriznik has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
444
Rank
348
High
21
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
66% (95-49)
Career Total W/L
34% (13-25)
74% (23-8)
YTD W/L
33% (6-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jerome Kym | Matic Kriznik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 74% (23/8) | 33% (6/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 73% (49/18) | 36% (14/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (369/263) | 44% (151/195) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 86% (6/1) | 25% (2/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (15/5) | 40% (4/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.56 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 171 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 35 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:51 | 1:36:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 110.9 | 138.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1217/1891) | 58% (571/993) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (901/1217) | 65% (370/571) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (368/674) | 47% (197/422) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (95/247) | 42% (37/89) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (890/2110) | 38% (400/1047) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (20/5) | 33% (6/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 77% (23/30) | 29% (5/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 96% (23/22) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 4% (23/1) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 8% (12/1) |
Jerome Kym Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Jerome Kym
59%
(
79 of
133)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
15
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
35%
(
47 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
102)
122
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Berk Bugarikj
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Jerome Kym
54%
(
53 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
35%
(
16 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Patrick Zahraj
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tom Gentzsch
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Nico Hipfl
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
41%
(
20 of
49)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tomas Lanik
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Jerome Kym
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
64%
(
28 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Matej Dodig
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
8 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Lukas Pokorny
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
51 of
124)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Matic Kriznik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Matic Kriznik
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Matic Kriznik
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Matic Kriznik
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matic Kriznik
Player
Paul Werren
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Matic Kriznik
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Kriznik
Player
Romain Faucon
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dev Javia
Player
Matic Kriznik
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Kriznik
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
38%
(
9 of
24)
1st Serve %
62%
(
8 of
13)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
22
Total Points Won
15
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saveliy Ivanov
Player
Matic Kriznik
44%
(
35 of
79)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kym Vs Kriznik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
